The War on Drugs Essay Example for Free

The fight on medicines EssayDespite large amounts of goernment funding and agencies working together the war on medicines is the most counterproductive measure the joined States has launched beca usage its main focus was to stop medicine trafficking and criminal activity, but it has done nothing but increase incarceration and large amounts of spending by the U. S. One of the first notices introduced to the unite States was the National Prohibition Act in 1920 and also the 18th Amendment. This bill prohibited the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcohol on a national stage for every day consumption. The precisely way to get a hold of alcohol at the time was to obtain a prescription drug from the doctor for medical purposes. This was just another way the government can valuate and control the use of alcohol consumption at the time. In 1933 the prohibition act was repealed. Because of the increase of other drug affectionateness abuse outside the abuse of alcohol wi th the approval of professorship Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Department of the Treasury the Federal chest of drawers of Narcotics was introduced and the adoption of the Uni form State Narcotics Drug Act was established and created.First the war on drugs has been a long and expensive campaign the United States has invested in, to include resources, and manpower. President Johnson was the first president to focus contraband drug use. He be believed half of the crime committed in the U. S. was in drug sexual congress and grow by 90 percent over the attached decade. The Johnson Administration was the true beginning on the state of war of Drugs. President Johnson created the Reorganization Plan of 1968 which merged the Bureau of Narcotics and the Bureau of Drug Abuse to form the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs within the Department of Justice.The belief during this time about drug use was summarized by journalist Max Lerner in his celebrated work America as a Civilizatio n As a case in point we may take the known fact of the prevalence of junction and dope addiction in Negro areas. This is essenti eachy explained in terms of poverty, slum living, and broken families, unless it would be easy to show the lack of drug addiction among other ethnic groups where the same conditions apply. (Inciardi The War on Drugs IV, 248)The use of term War on Drug was first used by President Richard Nixon in 1971. President Nixon was also wanting to continue the anti- war precedent set by Johnson. The loot of the U. S. to counteract the war, was to implement the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and mesh Act of 1970. When President Nixon and Admistration stated the end the war on drugs it was manly stated for laws and acts that was made from earlier prohibitation act and laws not for the sunrise(prenominal) era of drugs to sweep the United States .The actual term war on drugs was coined when in 1971 Congress of the United States released a report that there wa s a growing trend among the United States serve members from Vietnam that were addicted to diacetylmorphine and other control substances. The Bureau of Narcotics was replace with the Drug Enforcement Administration in 1973. As early as 1982, with the intense epic of drug use sweeping the nation the United States increased aid and more than involvement, tasking the help of the CIA and military indirection efforts national and international levels.Nixons drug force agencies practice illegal acts to make bind to meet demands of the public, this put a widely held of the arrested made was of African-American personal. The following two presidents Ford and Carter, unplowed the tradition of continuing to respond with programs of their predecessors. In 1982, Ronald Regan became President with a radical bias within the War on Drugs received a new revitalization. In a speech delivered soon after winning office, Reagan announced, Were pickings down the surrender flag that has flown over so many drug efforts were running up a battle flag.Within his first five years of being president he strengthened drug enforcement. He created mandatory sentencing, forfeiture of cash and real estate. In 1986 Reagan was suitable to pass the Anti-Drug Abuse Act through Congress. This legislation cost the tax payers a additional $1. 7 million to fund, established 29 mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses. Reagans former Vice-President George H. W. Bush was the next in the oval office. He shared the same political views and background as past presidents.Intensifying narcotics mandate when the First National Drug Control Strategy was issued by the Office of National Drug Control in 1989 and doing nothing to reduce sentencing disparities and racial bias carrying over from the Reagan administration. The following three presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama keep with the trend and maintaining the promise to overcome the epidemic of drugs that will not be tolerated and over come during taking office. There are over one million people every year in the United States incarcerated due to drug law violations.With the increase of the youth involvement of drug violation, this has had a everlasting put in of them to include permanent removal of training opportunities, the ability to vote, obtaining employment become far more tight because of violations of their youth. Studies show that the War on Drugs has made a permanent underclass of people who take on few educational or job opportunities, often as a result of being punished for drug offenses which in turn have resulted from attempts to earn a living in spite of having no education or job opportunities.The drug was is said to have wasted billions of wasted tax dollars and misallocated spending. The government has played out more money on the drug war then it was spend of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Due to the over whelming account of people being incarnated it has put a financial drain and a puts a dishonor on the legal and law enforcement resources. Due to prohibition in the United States, criminal organization have found other means of transportation, growing and distribution causing a lost of many lives.Drug cartels are the only organizations that gain profit from prohibition which is regenerated for smuggling, violence and corruption in government networks. The next generation on fighting the war of drugs is coming. The question is to ask are selves to spend are tax payer money on prevention or treatment. The US funded a research study that showed that all of the Governments effects to stop drug trafficking coming into the United States all little to no effect.From the RAND Corporation the study, waterproofing the Borders The Effects of Increased Military Participation in Drug Interdiction, was prepared by seven researchers, mathematicians and economists at the National Defense Research Institute, a branch of the RAND, and was released in 1988. (R. Reuter 1988) There ha ve been similar conclusions conducted by seven on organizations. The RAND corporation has also included that budget money for drug enforcement should be spent on treatment other then prevention.In 2008 a declaration was announced to balance a drug policy to the prevention, research, education and treatment. Many people are in favor of treatment and prevention instead of punishment sue to the high amounts of financing for law enforcement and court cost of the tax payers. In conclusion, the measure the United States have implemented to combat drugs, smuggling and drug abuse have been at best unsuccessful, and at worst counterproducvtive. If the United States truly desires to curb drug abuse, new forward view methods such treatment and rehabilitation would have to be implemented.