Ignorance Is Happiness

Ignorance is happiness Think about communication now, how do large number talk to each other? Think about entertainment, how do populate have fun? Or how about knowledge, how do great deal partake information? How do people find out about memorial? People today use cell ph whizzs, the Internet, and the television. But until about a century ago, no one had any of that. No one had Phones or flat screen TVs. No one had Face keep nates or peep accounts. So how did people back whence live and work? The arrange is with writing, with books. People still teach today, but what if people lost each(prenominal) interest in books?What if people turned on books? Would mass book fires start? Would books be outlawed and become illegal? What would partnership be resembling then? This is exactly what Ray Bradburys novel is about. In this book, the author describes a society where books have been banned by the government, and be causa of that, analphabetic is all that the people there ar e. In Ray Bradburys novel, Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451, he utilizes the setting, conflict, and point of view to enhance this theme. In literary works, the setting is the age and place a story takes place.Ray Bradbury used the futurist setting to turn up what a adult male where television and sea shell radios are the almost important occasions in a persons life would be like. Hes created a society sometime after 1990, in a place called Elm City. It is a place where every one is equally unintentional, where the government tries to brainwash everyone to non question anything. Beatty quoted, The home purlieu can undo a lot you try to do at school. Thats why weve lowered the kindergarten age socio-economic class after year until now were almost snatching them from the cradle (Bradbury 60).In order to make incontestable people grow up the way they want, the government has made undis cast offable children are taught from a very young age what they should believe in. Kids like C larisse McClellan are thought of as outcasts because she questions everything around her. The citizens then do not like to mobilize independently either. Faber said, Off-hours, yes. But time to think rushes you on so quickly to its own conclusions your mind hasnt time to protest, what guff (Bradbury 84). The quotes, patience, Montag. Let the war turn off the families. Our civilization is flinging itself to pieces. Stand back from the centrifuge (Bradbury 87), and, In again out again Finnegan (Bradbury 94), shows that people who they should wield about are not important. Husbands are off at war, and their wives do not care at all. The setting contributes a lot to the theme, without the futuristic setting, the impact would not have been as great. Characterization also plays a part in the story. Characterization is when the writer reveals the personality of or describes a character.This stand bys by letting the readers gain more understanding of the people of that time. Mrs. P he lp oneselfs stated, He (her husband) said, if I get killed off, you just go right ahead and dupet cry, but get married again, and dont think of me (Bradbury 95). This quote shows that relationships are not significant anymore people do not take the time to keep healthy relationships and communicate. Mildred quoted, Its scarce two thousand dollars. And I think you should consider me sometimes. (Bradbury 20).Even though shout Montag said that in order to have the fourth wall put in, hed have to pay a third of his per annum pay, Mildred does not seem to care. All she wants is her entertainment. Not all people then are like Mildred and Mrs. Phelps though, there are people like Clarisse McClellan. She said, I rarely watch the parlor walls or go to races or dramatic play Parks. So Ive lots of time for crazy thoughts, I make believe (Bradbury 9). Clarisse does not spend her time driving around at around the bend speeds running over pedestrians. She likes to take walks, enjoy natur e.She likes to taste the rain and expression the flowers. But because of this she was thought of as weird and crazy. in that location is definitely something upon with a society like that if someone like Clarisse became an outcast. The last thing that Ray Bradbury in cooperated into his novel was the conflicts. Conflicts are struggles between two forces. There were both external and congenital conflicts in the story. One conflict is and internal conflict when Montag blow ones stacked the woman, and starts to see that everything he had been doing his whole life was wrong, and starts inquire what books have to say. There must be something in books, things we cant imagine, to make a woman detain in a burning house there must be something there. You dont stay for nothing (Bradbury 51). Another conflict is between him and Mildred. Books are not people. You read and I look all around, but there isnt anybody (Bradbury 73). This shows how ignorant and shallow people like Mildred can be. She spends all day observation the television, completely immersed with her parlor families. The last conflict is between Montag and Beatty, or the society he lives in. Beatty said, serenity, Montag.Peace, Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet, into the incineratorburn all burn everything. Fire is bright and fire is clean (Bradbury 59-60). Beatty said that he too, was erstwhile curious about books, so he read them, laws or no laws. But he did not want to think about the meanings tin the words in books, and he turned against them. Beatty does not burn books because he is told to, but he actually believes in burning books. He believes that books cause confusion, contradictions, and disorder. But the one thing that he does not realize is that, that is what literature is for.There are many important messages that Fahrenheit 451 portrays. In order to help us understand them, Ray Bradburys novel, Fahrenheit 451 uses the setting, characterization, and conflict to help underli ne these themes. The setting that was created was a futuristic society. This helped the readers imagine what a world without books or knowledge would be like. The characterization of the people showed that everyone was happy without knowledge, and the people who were not were outcasts. Lastly the conflicts between the characters demonstrate the ignorance of the people.